Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
JUSTE v. RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff: ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant: RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG, MARTINEZ , JUDY PRESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01537
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02419
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Edar Rogler v. John Gallin, et al
as 09-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edar Rogler
Defendant - Appellee: John I. Gallin, M.D., in his personal capacity, Walter L. Jones, in his personal capacity, Hillary Fitilis, in her personal capacity and others
Edar Rogler v. John Gallin, et al
as 09-5079
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edar Rogler
Defendant - Appellee: John I. Gallin, M.D., in his personal capacity, Walter L. Jones, in his personal capacity, Hillary Fitilis, in her personal capacity and others
Edar Rogler v. John I. Gallin, et al
as 08-5505
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edar Rogler
Defendant - Appellee: John I. Gallin, M.D., in his personal capacity, Walter L. Jones, in his personal capacity, Hillary Fitilis, in her personal capacity and others
Interested Party - Appellee: North Law Publishers, Inc., a New York Corporation
Edar Rogler v. John Gallin
as 08-5476
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edar Rogler
Defendant - Appellee: John I. Gallin, M.D., in his personal capacity, Walter L. Jones, in his personal capacity, Hillary Fitilis, in her personal capacity and others
ROGLER v. BIGLOW et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02308
Plaintiff: EDAR ROGLER
Defendant: WILLIAM BIGLOW, JULIE LU, JOHN I. GALLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?