Cases 11 - 20 of 12,583
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02581
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CRUM v. CSOSA et al
as 1:2024cv02564
Defendant:
MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN SECURITY, CSOSA and U.S. ATTORNEY FOR DC
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BROWN v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv02538
Defendant:
AHLAM KEISSANI and FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
EON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REX v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024cv02605
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN J. REX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SUDAH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
AQUIL SUDAH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DC SUPERIOR COURT, MAYOR MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
NICHOLAS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv02530
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, JOSEPH BIDEN and LLOYD JAMES AUSTIN, III
Plaintiff:
JASON B. NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
