Cases 11 - 20 of 22
GAHR v. SAPERSTEIN et al
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant:
KARL ROVE, HUDSON INSTITUTE, JAY LEFKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN GAHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GASKIN v. EMBASSY OF CANADA TO THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT W. MCGL. GASKIN
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF CANADA TO THE UNITED STATES, PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA, JUSTIN TRUDEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RICHARDSON v. SAULS et al
as 1:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
EDWARD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
BILLY J. SAULS, ALBERT PLEASANT, IV, LARENCE DUBLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GASKIN et al v. MAY et al
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
SEAN GASKIN , JOHN SCANTLEBURY and FREDERICK CHRISTOPHER HAWKESWORTH
Defendant:
STEPHEN MAY, GORDON PATTEN, JR, JODI I AVERGUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BOATWRIGHT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
KEENAN BOATWRIGHT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA , PHOENIX HOUSES OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
