Cases 11 - 20 of 337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
FRAY v. BUTTIGIEG et al
as 1:2023cv03708
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. FRAY
Defendant:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, RYAN POSTEN, RODNEY RUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Smith v. USA, et al
as 23-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Metropolitan Police Department / Officer Smith Badge # 4858 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BUIE v. CROWE et al
as 1:2023cv03178
Plaintiff:
DAYONNA BUIE
Defendant:
TIFFANY CROWE, PAMELA A. SMITH, SHIRLEY KWAN-HUI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAIRSTON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAIRSTON
Defendant:
COURTNEY L. SMITH, KENNETH M. CARPENTER, AMANDA L. MEREDITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
