Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Patti Shaw v. Benjamin Kates, et al
as 13-5212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Patti Hammond Shaw
Defendant - Appellant:
Benjamin E. Kates, in his individual capacity and Troy Musgrove, in his individual capacity 12cv432
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Employees, in their individual capacities, Unknown MPD Employees, in their individual capacities and others
Patti Shaw v. Merrender Quicksey, et al
as 13-5213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Patti Hammond Shaw
Defendant - Appellant:
Merrender Quicksey, Lt., in his individual capacity 12cv432
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Benjamin E. Kates, in his individual capacity, Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Employees, in their individual capacities and others
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BENJAMIN E. KATES, STEVE CONBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKENS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
BENOIT BROOKENS and MARY TODD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAW v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BENJAMIN E. KATES, STEVE CONBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv00946
Plaintiff:
PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv00947
Plaintiff:
PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMEY v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv01391
Plaintiff:
AVA RAMEY
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and RUTH HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
