Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Chu, et al v. United States Navy, et al
as 12-5027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches, Robert Duane Purser, Lieutenant Commander, Robert H. Adair and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the U.s. Navy and others
:
SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., et al
as 09-5069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Blair Sibley
Defendant - Appellee:
Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others
SIBLEY v. ALITO et al
as 1:2008cv01797
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR., STEPHEN G. BREYER, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: Navy Chaplain
as 07-5359
:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches, Robert Duane Purser, Lieutenant Commander, Robert H. Adair and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Hansford T. Johnson, Secretary of the U.S. Navy and others
IN RE: NAVY CHAPLAINCY
as 1:2007mc00269
Plaintiff:
CHAPLAINCY OF FULL GOSPEL CHURCHES, ROBERT DUANE PURSER, ROBERT H. ADAIR and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NAVY, UNITED STATES NAVY, UNITED STATES NAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
