Cases 21 - 30 of 42
TRIBBLE v. GREENE et al
as 1:2015cv00710
Plaintiff:
SANTAE A. TRIBBLE
Defendant:
RAYMOND JEFFREY GREENE, THOMAS J. KILCULLEN, ESTATE OF THOMAS J. KILCULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
WOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CHARLES KIEL , CHARANDIP SEKHON and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Pauletta Higgins v. Brenda Anthony, et al
as 14-7177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pauletta Higgins
Defendant - Appellee:
Brenda Anthony, Hamilton County Juvenile Court, Marjorie Davis, Hamilton County Juvenile Court, Ernest Lee, Hamilton County Juvenile Court and others
WOOD, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv00769
Plaintiff:
TARCHA WOOD and D. W.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
HALL v. WOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY HALL
Defendant:
TIERRA WOOD and L. MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
as 1:2012cv01971
Plaintiff:
TONI WOOD
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
CONNELL v. WOODS
as 1:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. CONNELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID B. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AL BALUCHI et al v. WOODS
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
AMMAR AL BALUCHI and WALID BIN ATTASH
Defendant:
DAVID B. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gloria Halcomb v. Napodon Woods, et al
as 11-7031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gloria A. Halcomb
Defendant - Appellant:
Napodon Woods, Officer of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Police
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Government
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
