Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FLETCHER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2018cv01070
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE, KARL A. RACINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SEWARD COUNTY KANSAS AND COLLAGE and STATE OF KANSAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Aror O'Diah v. Richard Cordray, et al
as 17-5170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aror Ark O'diah
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Cordray, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, JPMorgan Chase & Co., also known as JPMorgan Chase Corporate, also known as Chase Bank and others
JENKINS v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01476
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, STATE OF KANSAS, FEDERAL JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
SHEWANDA PRICE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, HOUSE OF RUTH, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Deborah Fletcher v. EDUC
as 16-5275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah Diane Fletcher
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Education
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
