Cases 21 - 30 of 42
ANDERSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01733
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CHRISTOPHE E. GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
GRIFFIN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BARD DENALI CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Charles Simon v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Federal Prison Industries, Inc. and others
SIMON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01310
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT , FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DADE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
LEROY P. DADE, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'NEAL v. PRETRIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAFRANCES DUDLEY O'NEAL
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES , U.S PROBATION DEPARTMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERKE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2012cv01347
Plaintiff:
LARRY BERKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
