Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Habtamu Daniel v. Maryland Police Department, et al
as 15-5148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Habtamu Daniel
Defendant - Appellee:
Maryland Police Department, District of Columbia Housing Authority, Alexandria Housing Authority and others
DANIEL v. MARYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00603
Plaintiff:
HABTAMU DANIEL
Defendant:
MARYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC HOUSING AUTHORITY, ALEXANDRIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
COSBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv01855
Plaintiff:
LEONA COSBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS , OFFICE OF THE CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv01499
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. DIXON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JULIUS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2009cv02249
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JULIUS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01386
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, LINDA S. MCMAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
