Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. KABAKAR et al
as 1:2018cv00559
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant:
RICHARD ABEL KABAKAR, STATE OF ILLINOIS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WILSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCOTT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. SCOTT
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, NATIONAL REAGAN AIRPORT, PENTAGON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FBI HEADQUARTERS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, YOLO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION et al
as 1:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION, GREGORY JOHN GUTFELD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02793
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02167
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01733
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CHRISTOPHE E. GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
