Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MCKEEMAN v. BUSH et al
as 1:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
RITA MORRIS MCKEEMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, LEXIS CAR CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDREWS v. BRIDGWORLTH et al
as 1:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
ZOE G. ANDREWS
Defendant:
WAYNE BRIDGWORLTH, ERIC BASEK, ERIC TAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FRANCIS v. STATE GOVERNMENT OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2008cv01491
Plaintiff:
SHAUN FRANCIS
Defendant:
STATE GOVERNMENT OF HAWAII, COPS OF HAWAII, NEW HOPE CHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEMERY et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND et al
as 1:2008cv01304
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MANUEL DEMERY, TIJUANA DARLENE DEMERY and WAYNE MABRY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and KATHERINE FUMAGALLI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
