Cases 41 - 50 of 473
LU v. EID et al
as 1:2021cv01389
Defendant:
CLARK WADDOUPS and ALLISON H. EID
Plaintiff:
YAN-XU LU and YUNG-KAI LU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CHEBLI v. KABLE , IV et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Defendant:
DAVID PEKOSKE, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD CHEBLI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
MAHONEY v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H GIBSON, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
REV. PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OKEREKE v. MCMAHON et al
as 1:2021cv00518
Defendant:
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, MICHAEL H. PARK, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. COMMERCE INSURANCE et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
KARLENE A VALENTE INSURANCE AGENCY INCORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS' REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES, COMMERCE INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAYMAN v. BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Defendant:
ROY MCLEESE, VANESSA RUIZ, JOHN M. STEADMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. GRIESA et al
as 1:2021cv00265
Defendant:
COLLEEN MCMAHOON, CLERK, YENNI LIU and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. MEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Defendant:
KENNETH M. MEAD, SCOTT NEILSON, ANDREA EDLANA MITRE and others
Plaintiff:
SHANISE-MARIE ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIZARRO v. MEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
ERIC ADAM GOODMAN, H. SUTTON, SCOTT NEILSON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR-MANUEL-JR PIZARRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
