Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Sukit Kumvachirapitag, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 10-7048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sukit N. Kumvachirapitag
Defendant - Appellee:
Microsoft Corporation, and Seventy nine or more Corporations, Glover Park Group and Bill Gates
KUMVACHIRAPITAG v. GATES et al
as 1:2009cv01906
Plaintiff:
SUKIT N. KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant:
BILL GATES, MICROSOFT CORP. and GLOVER PARK GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR ASSOCIATION, MARK C. LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
POWERS v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2007cv00954
Plaintiff:
ANN POWERS
Defendant:
BILL CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting
as 07-5127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Bill Gradison, Kayla J. Gillan and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Council of Institutional Investors, G. Bradford Cook, Roderick M. Hills and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Legal Foundation
HURT v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
BILL CLINTON, HILLARY CLINTON and U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown, Ronald L. v. Wheat First Sec, et al
as 00-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald L. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Wheat First Securities Inc, First Union Corporation, Marshall Wishnack and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
