Cases 41 - 50 of 64
RUSSELL v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
MAXINE RUSSELL
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
EDMUNDS v. BUSH et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANN EDMUNDS
Defendant:
GEORGE W BUSH, SR, KEITH ZOLLINGER, MARTHA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Marilyn Vann, et al v. DOI, et al
as 11-5322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Vann, Ronald Moon, Donald Moon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and Bill John Baker, in his Official Capacity as Acting Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation
Intervenor - Appellee:
Cherokee Nation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
