Cases 41 - 50 of 71
ROWLAND v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
DAVONTA MELVIN ROWLAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Petitioner:
SPENCER TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, NORA BARRY FISHER, CIA OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 1:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
KELVIN J MILES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Billy Smith v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-5034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney General, District of Columbia Juvenile Court and others
SMITH v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUVENILE COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rancourt, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-5341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael A. Rancourt and Mark A. Simari
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CALDWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv01438
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOHN ROBERTS, ELANA KAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Hodge v. Pamela Talkin, et al
as 13-5250
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Harold H. Hodge
Defendant - Appellant:
Pamela Talkin, Marshal of the United States Supreme Court and Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Esquire, in his official capacity as United States Attorney
v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2013mc00727
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
