Cases 51 - 60 of 125
ZORGANI, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al
as 1:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED MEDHI ZORGANI and SOUKAINA LAASIRI
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and JOHN & JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Ball v. Maricopa County, et al
as 17-5210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant - Appellee:
Maricopa County, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-X and others
TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
KELLEE TAYLOR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ATLANTA RESTAURANT PARTNERS. LLC, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON-FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORSE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01216
Plaintiff:
SHAY HORSE , ELIZABETH LAGESSE , JUDAH ARIEL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , PETER NEWSHAM , JOHN/JANE DOE MPD OFFICERS 1-150 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STORMS v. SHINSEKI et al
as 1:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
DERRICK STORMS
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, JOSE D. RIOJAS, KEVIN SECOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. MARICOPA COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JOHN DOES 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. ARROW SERVICE & TOWING et al
as 1:2016cv02132
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
ARROW SERVICE & TOWING, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
