Cases 61 - 70 of 2,125
QTAISH v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
INEZ QTAISH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAWFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
as 1:2023cv03906
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
T.F. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03612
Plaintiff:
TF and T.F.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Michael Hurd, Jr. v. DC
as 23-7176
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Hurd, Jr.
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Government and District of Columbia
Alexander Gallo v. DC
as 23-7158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander Gallo
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
KLAU v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03505
Plaintiff:
RONALD KLAU
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
David Smith v. USA, et al
as 23-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Metropolitan Police Department / Officer Smith Badge # 4858 and others
Danny Hirschfield v. United States Attorney's Office for the District, et al
as 24-5008
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Hirschfield, Lord
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Criminal Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Onyinye Jideani v. Robert Rigsby
as 23-7165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Onyinye Jideani
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert R. Rigsby, Judge; Civil Action Judge at the District of Columbia Superior Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
