Cases 61 - 70 of 106
WILLETT v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2018cv01707
Defendant:
PATRICK P O'CARROLL, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JOHN D WILCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLETT and JEFFREY M. WILLETT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKOY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR MCKOY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and OFFICER JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. IVANOV et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
SERGEY IVANOV, LES VERMILLION, SONDRA YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02811
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, NANCY BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. MCVEIGH et al
as 1:2017cv02370
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BRIAN MCVEIGH, L. ERIC PATTERSON, JOSEPH MAHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Scahill, et al v. DC, et al
as 17-7151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Scahill and HRH Services LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and John Does 1-10, being the fictitious names of agents and employees of the ABC Board who are not presently known to Plaintiff
ROSSMANN v. NETANYAHU et al
as 1:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, "JEWS" MORE GENERALLY, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Ball v. Maricopa County, et al
as 17-5210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant - Appellee:
Maricopa County, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-X and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
