Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Derek Jarvis v. Louis DeJoy
as 23-5182
Plaintiff / Appellant: Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee: Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
JARVIS v. DEJOY
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff: DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant: LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JARVIS v. DEJOY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01970
Plaintiff: DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant: LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff: SHADONIE PAYLOR
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OFFICER Caleb Demeritt, OFFICER JOSHUA JARVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derek Jarvis v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-5279
Plaintiff / Appellant: Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee: Kilolo Kijakazi, The United States of America and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02373
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JARVIS v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01523
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: DEREK N. JARVIS
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derek Jarvis v. DC, et al
as 14-7019
Plaintiff - Appellant: Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant - Appellee: District of Columbia, Office of the Mayor, DC Attorney General's Office and others
JARVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv00142
Plaintiff: DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01005
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?