Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richard Jasmin v. Attorney for DAV, et al
as 23-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Jasmin
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney for DAV, Day-multiple attorneys, multiple locations. Service is on HQ and Denis McDonough, VA Secretary
Princess Spencer v. Day Services
as 23-7021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Princess Maria Spencer
Defendant / Appellee:
Day Services
SPENCER v. DAY SERVICES
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS MARIA SPENCER
Defendant:
DAY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02397
Plaintiff:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant:
GEORGE ERVIN PERDUE, III and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COMMON CAUSE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02023
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., CHERYL L. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA M. ALEXANDER, ROBERTO AGUIRRE, SHEILA AGUIRRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
LIBBY GARLAND, LUSH COSMETICS LLC, STEVEN RUGGLES and others
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH WARREN, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and RON WYDEN
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
JOHNSON v. PROGRESSIVE MAX INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv03468
Defendant:
CLEVELAND INDIANS, ARX HOLDING CORPORATION, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE AGENCY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
