Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ADAIR FORD BOROUGHS, KAMALA D. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Navy Chaplaincy, et al v. United States Navy, et al
as 13-5071
In Re:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches, Robert Duane Purser, Lieutenant Commander, Robert H. Adair and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the U.s. Navy and others
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Chu, et al v. United States Navy, et al
as 12-5027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches, Robert Duane Purser, Lieutenant Commander, Robert H. Adair and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the U.s. Navy and others
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Navy Chaplain
as 07-5359
:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches, Robert Duane Purser, Lieutenant Commander, Robert H. Adair and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Hansford T. Johnson, Secretary of the U.S. Navy and others
IN RE: NAVY CHAPLAINCY
as 1:2007mc00269
Plaintiff:
CHAPLAINCY OF FULL GOSPEL CHURCHES, ROBERT DUANE PURSER, ROBERT H. ADAIR and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NAVY, UNITED STATES NAVY, UNITED STATES NAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2004cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.