Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CLEMENT v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CLEMENT and HH EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA LOCS IS OUR ARTIFACT OF FAITH
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 1:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. STRINGER
Defendant:
JOHN DOWNY, CARL BABIER, JIM HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Z. B. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv03442
Plaintiff:
H. C., G. S., WENDY ADLER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 1:2020cv01898
Defendant:
CARL STEWTART, LINDA ANDERSON, JIM HOOD and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. STRINGER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
CLEMENTS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01188
Plaintiff:
C. AARON CLEMENTS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and KELVIN KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Neuman v. United States Government
as 08-5535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, United States Department of Justice, Department of Coordination and Review for the Department of Justice and others
NEUMAN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAMES NEUMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF COORDINATION AND REVIEW FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Consol Defendant:
CONDOLEEZZA RICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 98-5036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
