Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACK v. SPRING et al
as 1:2021cv01431
Defendant:
NAI SPRING, DAN SPRING, MICHAEL GILL and others
Plaintiff:
GUY ANDREW MACK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, SETH RYAN, DAVID WAITE and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STONE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DAN CALDWELL, CHRIS BRUYN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARHAN and BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
LOVELIEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00906
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, JAMES COMEY, LORETTA LYNCH and others
Plaintiff:
RICK LOVELIEN and STEVEN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVELIEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01869
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Nadia Ahmed, Daniel Schiess and others
Plaintiff:
Rick Lovelien and Steven Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
