Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FITZGERALD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv03411
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SECRETARY OF STATE, SHERRY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leslie McMillin v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-5161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leslie McMillin
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Justice; in his official capacity as U.S. Attorney General for the United States of America, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and Janet L. Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Treasury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HEMPHILL v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2021cv00673
Defendant:
D.C. RETIREMENT BOARD and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HEMPHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. STORY et al
as 1:2019cv03856
Defendant:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, JENNIFER BECKWITH, DOUGLAS PRESETON WOODLOCK and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENEFEE v. RUBIN et al
as 1:2019cv01042
Defendant:
PAUL RYAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
ELGEN MENEFEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
