Cases 1 - 5 of 5
MONTGOMERY et al v. COMEY et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN and DENNIS MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , MICHAEL S. ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rand Paul, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rand Paul, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and FreedomWorks, Inc., on behalf of itself, its members, and all others similarly situated
Movant - Appellant:
David Andrew Christenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, in his official capacity as President of the United States, James R. Clapper, Jr., in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence, Keith B. Alexander, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service and others
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Larry Elliott Klayman, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Charles Strange, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Ann Strange, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant:
David Andrew Christenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, Individually and in his professional capacity, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Individually and in his professional capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Keith B. Alexander, Individually and in his professional capacity, Director of the National Security Agency and others
PAUL et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
RAND PAUL and FREEDOMWORKS, INC.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JAMES R. CLAPPER, JR., KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Movant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
