Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Rise et al v. Baghsaw et al
as 1:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Treacy Gaffney, Sonalee Rashatwar, Sam Rise and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE USCP OFFICERS 1-50, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN DOE SUPERVISING USCP OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BRIDGES WARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv02319
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BRIDGES WARD
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
WATSON v. UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02281
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3, JOHN DOE #4, UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WATSON v. UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02273
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 5, UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZAVADOVSKY et al v. CHEATLE et al
as 1:2024cv01997
Defendant:
MARIO RABL, SUSANNE HOFLINGER, KIMBERLY CHEATLE and others
Plaintiff:
BORIS ZAVADOVSKY and ELENA DVOINIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEARNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01793
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER OF USPP, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff:
ERICA KEARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and TARIQUE ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe v. Jonathan McKernan, et al
as 24-5049
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jonathan McKernan, in his official capacity as Director of FDIC and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
