Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMES RAY
Defendant:
DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 14-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Davis, Senator, John Jenkins, Vicki Bargas and others
Trevor Burt v. Natl. Repub. Club of Cap. Hill, et al
as 12-7003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Trevor Burt
Defendant - Appellee:
National Republican Club of Capitol Hill and Stanley Lawson, in his individual capacity
CARR v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL et al
as 1:2010cv01976
Plaintiff:
KHALIL CARR
Defendant:
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL and STANLEY LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURT v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL et al
as 1:2010cv01911
Plaintiff:
TREVOR BURT
Defendant:
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL and STANLEY LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRAWFORD v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL et al
as 1:2010cv01801
Plaintiff:
KIM M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CLUB OF CAPITOL HILL and STANLEY LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
