Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Chris Rufer, et al v. FEC
as 14-5240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chris Rufer, Libertarian Party Of Indiana and Libertarian National Congressional Committee Inc
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
RUFER et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
CHRIS RUFER , LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF INDIANA and LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE INC
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIBERTARIAN PARTY et al v. STEPHEN DANZANSKY, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01248
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY , GARY JOHNSON , BRUCE MAJORS and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN DANZANSKY, DEBORAH NICHOLS, DEVARIESTE CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Libertarian Party, et al v. DC Board of Elections, et al
as 11-7029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Libertarian Party, Bob Barr, J. Bradley Jansen and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, Vincent C. Gray, Mayor of the District of Columbia and Irvin B. Nathan, Attorney General for the District of Columbia
LIBERTARIAN PARTY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS et al
as 1:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY, BOB BARR, J. BRADLEY JANSEN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Natl Black Plce Assn, et al v. DC Bd Elect Ethics
as 98-7120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Black Police Association, District of Columbia Chapter of the Republican National African-American Council, Libertarian Party and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
D.C. Statehood Party, Jeffrey L. Coudriet, Ken Fealing and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
