Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02540
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROSSMANN v. LEADER et al
as 1:2020cv01221
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
JEWS MORE GENERALLY, REUBEN SMITH, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. NETANYAHU et al
as 1:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, "JEWS" MORE GENERALLY, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv01508
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GIBSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ONE OR MORE JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Petitioner:
SPENCER TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, NORA BARRY FISHER, CIA OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sukit Kumvachirapitag, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 10-7048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sukit N. Kumvachirapitag
Defendant - Appellee:
Microsoft Corporation, and Seventy nine or more Corporations, Glover Park Group and Bill Gates
JANE DOE v. CROWELL & MORING, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv00417
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
CROWELL & MORING, LLP, TRINA L. FAIRLEY, DANIEL M. CREEKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
ADDAMS-MORE v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA et al
as 1:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
MARTI ADDAMS-MORE
Defendant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA, A.P.A., A.P.A. PUBLISHING, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADDAMS-MORE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02022
Plaintiff:
MARTI ADDAMS-MORE
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
