Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ADENARIWO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
ADE ADENARIWO, THERESA BROOKS, DENINE EDMONDS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.P. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
K.P. and Kia Pollard
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Archie Brawner, Alison Bull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sean Gaskin, et al v. Stephen May, et al
as 23-5124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sean Gaskin, John Scantlebury, also known as John Wayne Trotman and Frederick Christopher Hawkesworth
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen May, Gordon Patten, Jr., Jodi L. Avergun and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 23-7011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
May Chen
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Police Department, Tilden Garden, Inc., West Covina State of California and others
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHEN v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
MAY CHEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, TILDEN GARDEN, INC., DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
