Cases 1 - 10 of 22
BURNS v. STERLING STFH et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DENNIS BURNS, SR.
Defendant:
STERLING STFH, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS FAMILY CENTER, ROSLYNN WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURNS v. STERLING STFH et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DENNIS BURNS, SR.
Defendant:
STERLING STFH, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS FAMILY CENTER, ROSLYNN WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARHAM et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
EVELYN PARHAM, NICHOLE JONES, CARLOTTA MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, GABRIEL ROBINSON and GLEN LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 14-7028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
