Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Larry Klayman, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-5208
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Larry Elliott Klayman, Michael Ferrari, Charles Strange and others
Movant - Appellant:
David Andrew Christenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barack Hussein Obama, Keith B. Alexander and others
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman, Michael Ferrari, Charles Strange and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Larry Elliott Klayman, Michael Ferrari, Charles Strange and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Google, Inc. and others
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00881
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , MICHAEL FERRARI , CHARLES STRANGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
In re: Long-distance Telephone Servic
as 12-5380
In Re:
In re: Long-distance Telephone Service Federal Excise Tax Refund Litigation-MDL 1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Gurrola, Virginia Sloan, Gary M. Sable and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Belloni
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service, Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
BRETT v. BUSH et al
as 1:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBERT GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRETT v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01436
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MASTER URSO BARRY, PATRICIA FAWSETT and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
