Cases 1 - 10 of 16
VALENTINE v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VALENTINE
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, GEORGE WASHINGTON MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES and UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. BURNS et al
as 1:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
WILLIAM BURNS and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 1:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, KATHLEEN JENNINGS, CERRON CADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Emmanuel Robinson v. DC, et al
as 16-7104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Emmanuel S. Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, Mayor, Yvette M. Alexander, Committee Chair and others
ROBINSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv02218
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL S. ROBINSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL E. BOWSER, YVETTE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valentine Andela v. EEOC
as 15-5178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Valentine B. Andela, doing business as Cancer-Africa tm
Defendant - Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, USA
ANDELA v. USA/U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
VALENTINE B. ANDELA
Defendant:
USA/U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
