Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LACY v. TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY et al
as 1:2022cv03537
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY, DAVE RAMSEY, APPELLATE COURT OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LACY v. TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY, DAVE RAMSEY, APPELLANT APPEAL COURT OF MIDDLE TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LACY v. RAMSEY et al
as 1:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
DAVE RAMSEY, STATE OF TENNESSEE and APPELATE COURT OF APPEALS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HORAN v. MCGEE et al
as 1:2021cv01451
Defendant:
SHERRY DOCKINS-PRITCHETT, DONALD E. PARISH, WAYNE FUQUA and others
Plaintiff:
MYRA CHARLENE HORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02269
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
XELUP v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2017cv02049
Plaintiff:
TUSHKAHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Newdow, et al v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 09-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Arthur Newdow, Ellery Schempp, Mel Lipman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Presidential Inaugural Committee, PIC, Emmett Beliveau, Executive Director, PIC and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of Texas, American Center for Law and Justice, State of Alabama and others
James Neuman v. United States Government
as 08-5535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, United States Department of Justice, Department of Coordination and Review for the Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
