Cases 141 - 150 of 437
HALL v. SESSIONS
as 1:2017cv02467
Petitioner:
CLYDE WILLIAMS HALL, JR.
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02399
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOGGINS et al v. SARIS et al
as 1:2017cv02397
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DOGGINS and CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant:
PATTI B. SARIS, CHARLES R. BREYER, DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. USA
as 1:2017cv02182
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MARTIN BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOSQUERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
OMAR ANCHICO MOSQUERA, CALVIN SOLOMON, MARK ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and KNOWN AND UNKNOWN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2017cv02058
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, WILLIAM DRIGGERS and DELORES F. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02059
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RICHARD M. DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUNTER v. U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01545
Petitioner:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Respondent:
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STANTON v. YOUNT et al
as 1:2017cv01480
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN WILLIAM STANTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH D. YOUNT, WILLIAM L. TROY, LORNA B. ESTEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
