Cases 11 - 20 of 37
ALLEN v. STATE OF NEVADA et al
as 1:2017cv01110
Petitioner:
GENE ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA, 8TH J.D.C. CLARK COUNTY and RENEE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, MARY GORDON BAKER and BRUCE HOWE HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Modrall v. Johns Hopkins University, et al
as 16-7095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert G. Modrall
Defendant - Appellee:
Johns Hopkins University, SAIS, Peter Lewis, Sarah Cook and others
MODRALL v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv01566
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. MODRALL
Defendant:
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, PETER LEWIS, SARAH COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, MICHAEL F. EASLEY and JOHN H. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01388
Petitioner:
CLARENCE BAKER
Respondent:
CHARLIE PETERSON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Johnson v. DC, et al
as 15-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Roy Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, John A. Burke, Detective, Metropolitan Police Department and others
BAKER v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv01684
Plaintiff:
MARIO N. BAKER
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
