Cases 11 - 20 of 20
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID IGE, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MARK WAYNE CHESTANG, KENNY MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2011cv01134
Plaintiff:
TONITA HALL
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOTT BALLARD, SAMUEL OLENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Davis v. State of Georgia
as 11-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Leroy Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Georgia
DAVIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2011cv00479
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONDON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2010cv01708
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LONDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and HENRY H. KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
SMITH v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2010cv01299
Plaintiff:
KEITH SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and THURBERT BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONDON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LONDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and THURBERT BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOY v. DONALD et al
as 1:2009cv00700
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON FOY
Defendant:
JAMES E. DONALD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD OF PAROLE AND PARDONS, HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 95-5357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terminated Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
