Cases 11 - 20 of 23
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID IGE, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIOLI v. CITY OF NEW BERN et al
as 1:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
DANA SCIOLI
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BERN, COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01524
Plaintiff:
KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CANADY, DAVID HOLMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINTZ v. GERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00640
Petitioner:
SCOTT HINTZ
Respondent:
SUSAN B. GERSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LISA MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PARKS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
DARRELL J. PARKS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDSON v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
HARVEY J. HUDSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL-NAJAR et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv02143
Petitioner:
REDHA AL-NAJAR and HOUCINE AL-NAJAR
Respondent:
ROBERT GATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01397
Plaintiff:
LEON JACKSON
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, US MARSHAL SERVICE, JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
