Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Larry Lasko v. DOJ, et al
as 10-5068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lyle Lasko
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, DOJ, Drug Enforcement Administration, Tioga County Sherriff's Department and others
Alvin Truesdale v. DOJ, et al
as 09-5215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin B. Truesdale
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission, Federal Bureau of Prisons, All in their official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5209
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MARKS v. DOES et al
as 1:2009cv00943
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00924
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ANDERSON v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00521
Plaintiff:
RONALD ANDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, SANDRA G. HYLTON and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRUESDALE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al
as 1:2008cv01862
Plaintiff:
ALVIN B. TRUESDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AMADI V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL.,
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
OKECHUKWU MUMMEE AMADI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
IJEMBA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2007cv01071
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER IFFANYI IJEMBA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
