Cases 11 - 20 of 153
TAYLOR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, LEONARD VANDERLINDE, JULIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RONALD N. FICAROTTA, CHIEF JUDGE 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HEARD v. HARRIS
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS DERON HEARD
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01546
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN STITT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEDINGTON v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRACZYK v. LEVITAN et al
as 1:2021cv00312
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS and JACOB LEVITAN
Plaintiff:
ERIK W TRACZYK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADIN et al v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv03104
Respondent:
JACKSON, HOLST, WILBURN and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ROSS, RAYMOND GAJEWSKI, SCOTT HOWIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv03074
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY FAMILY COURTS SYSTEM, JOHN SMITH, ROBERT RADER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
