Cases 11 - 20 of 24
AGBONIFO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OJEGBA AGBONIFO
Defendant:
MATTHEW S. BOYDEN, USPS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Graham, Jr. v. FCC Coleman USP II
as 16-5179
Petitioner - Appellant:
David Graham, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC Coleman USP II, WARDEN
Harry Riddick v. J. Holland, et al
as 14-5324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry Lee Riddick
Defendant - Appellee:
J. C. Holland, Warden, USP McCreary, Zane D. Memenger, United States Attorney, Andrea G. Foulkes, Assistant United States Attorney and others
GRAHAM v. FCC COLEMAN USP II
as 1:2014cv01567
Petitioner:
DAVID GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrew Gross, III v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5262
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andrew Gross
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the U.S., Harley G. Lappin, Bureau of Prisons Director and Charles L. Lockett, Warden, Terre Haute USP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HILL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, REGIONAL DIRECTORS OVER SPECIAL MANAGEMENT UNITS, U.S.P. SPECIAL HOUSING UNITS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. FCC COLEMAN
as 1:2009cv01411
Petitioner:
JAMES B. CRAWFORD
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roger Jackman v. USA, et al
as 09-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Jackman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Management and Policy Makers, Bureau of Prisons, Management and Policy Makers and others
BOYD v. WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN -USP II
as 1:2009cv00511
Petitioner:
PADER R. BOYD
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN -USP II
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
