Cases 11 - 20 of 43
SHARRITT v. BASS
as 1:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. SHARRITT
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BASS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
WALTER BRADLEY
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ v. WAINSTEIN et al
as 1:2014cv02164
Plaintiff:
WALTER MARTINEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN, WILLIAM J. O'MALLEY, JR., ELISABETH S. POTEAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. THEYER et al
as 1:2014cv01986
Plaintiff:
WALTER IVAN NUNEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THEYER, ANNE GARDNER, LEONNARD MONTERREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01894
Petitioner:
RADCLIFFE BANCROFT LEWIS
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SENIOR JUDGES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEMON v. O'MALLEY et al
as 1:2014cv00848
Plaintiff:
ARRON FREDERICK LEMON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUGLAS GANSLER, DAVID BRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAELIN v. BARNHILL et al
as 1:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
TODD WALTER KAELIN
Defendant:
A. BARNHILL, MAIER, KELLY SEDOCHENKOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHANIE JONES, CORY D. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOLASPRASHAD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WALTER M. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. USA
as 1:2013cv01117
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WALTER MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
