Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Harvey Hudson v. Attorney General of the United, et al
as 09-5090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harvey J. Hudson
Defendant - Appellee:
Attorney General of the United States, US Department of Justice, District of Columbia Government, Office of Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Director and others
HUDSON v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
HARVEY J. HUDSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL-NAJAR et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv02143
Petitioner:
REDHA AL-NAJAR and HOUCINE AL-NAJAR
Respondent:
ROBERT GATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL BAKRI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01307
Petitioner:
AMIN AL BAKRI and MUHAMMAD AL BAKRI
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT GATES, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AHMAD et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00952
Petitioner:
JAWED AHMAD, JAWED AHMAD, ABDUL BAQI and others
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT GATES, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ALBERTO GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUZATULLAH v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2006cv01707
Petitioner:
RUZATULLAH, RUZATULLAH, RUZATULLAH and others
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and ROBERT GATES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAQALEH et al v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2006cv01669
Petitioner:
FADI AL MAQALEH and AHMAD AL MAQALEH
Respondent:
DONALD RUMSFELD, JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant:
ROBERT GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
