Cases 21 - 30 of 84
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SERPA-CANDELARIA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUAN SERPA-CANDELARIA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS v. PETERS
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
CLAY C. KEYS
Respondent:
COLLETE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LANGAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02524
Plaintiff:
DONNA LANGAN and PETER KEVIN LANGAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ELIZABETH STAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01496
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJAYI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01019
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MURIEL BOWSER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Plaintiff:
OLUWASHOLA OLANIYI AJAYI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GAKUBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03300
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
