Cases 21 - 30 of 48
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MASON et al
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MASON, ROBINSON, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2014cv02180
Petitioner:
ADRIAN O'NEILL ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DIRECTOR OF THE USPTO, MARGARET PEGGY FOCARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. KING et al
as 1:2014cv00901
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE ROBINSON
Defendant:
PAUL A. KING, JAMES J. PETERS and JOHN SUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HUERTA
as 1:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL E. ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL HUERTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK P. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODINE v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES GOODINE
Defendant:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER, NATHANIEL ROBINSON and MR. FINCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
JAMES V. ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
