Cases 21 - 30 of 199
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02247
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
VIALVA v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM P. BARR, WILLIAM E. WILSON, M.D., NICOLE C. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANDRE VIALVA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SNIPES v. CHUTKAN et al
as 1:2020cv01477
Defendant:
JANE DOES, TANYA S. CHUTKAN, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
LEON SNIPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELDRIDGE v. BLANKENSU
as 1:2020cv01009
Respondent:
BOON BLANKENSU
Petitioner:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
NELSON V. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00557
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Nelson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCNAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv03576
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, MICHAEL T. WOOD and GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
AGEDAH v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA-CRIMINAL DIVISION
as 1:2019cv01935
Petitioner:
THEOPHILUS T. AGEDAH
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA-CRIMINAL DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
