Cases 31 - 40 of 74
HOUSTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON
Defendant:
P. JOHNSON, ANDERSON and R. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATRICK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
TAMBU PATRICK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RONALD MACHEN, TONY COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
PURNELL R. NELSON
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DENIS DONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREELY-BEY v. COURT SERVICES SUPERVISOR et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
ERNEST M. GREELY-BEY
Defendant:
COURT SERVICES SUPERVISOR, ANDERSON, C. BENTELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2013cv01631
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MILANO et al
as 1:2013cv01474
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MILANO, M. JOSIAH, F. MENSAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Will Anderson v. BOP, et al
as 13-5298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Will Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
ROUDABUSH v. C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA et al
as 1:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA, LT. JOSIAH, SGT. JESSUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al
as 1:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
WILL ANDERSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS RECORD OFFICE PERSONEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
ANDERSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ANDERSON
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
