Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 77
CHANDLER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01491
Plaintiff: JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS , CHARLES SAMUELS , CHARLES PORCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5164
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Karen Ripple, et al
as 16-5097
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: Karen Ripple, Fed. Probation Ofc., Intake Counsel, D.C. Bar Assn., Supervisor, Fed. Probation Office and others
CHANDLER v. FOX
as 1:2016cv00706
Petitioner: JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Respondent: JACK FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCOY v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2015cv02126
Plaintiff: FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.
Defendant: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, GARY MAYNARD and GREGG HERSHBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01941
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ROUDABUSH v. RIPPLE et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: KAREN RIPPLE, INTAKE COUNSEL, SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF DALLAS/TX et al
as 1:2015cv00884
Plaintiff: DIETRICK L JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant: CITY OF DALLAS/TX, DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, DALLAS POLICE IMPOUND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. KIRBY
as 1:2015cv00385
Petitioner: OZEE ROGERS, SR
Respondent: MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EALY v. CHILDS et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner: LARRY E. EALY, SR.
Respondent: SEMOINE CHILDS, KOBI COOPER, NICOLAI DAVENPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?