Cases 31 - 40 of 2,278
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02704
Petitioner:
BRIAN MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
AKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02597
Petitioner:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
